Tuesday 28 June 2011

Havaldar Lalak Jan Shaahed





Havaldar Lalak Jan Shaahed (1967 – 7 July 1999) was born in Yasin, in the Ghizer District, of the Northern Areas of Pakistan (now called Gilgit-Baltistan). After school he joined the Pakistan Army, and reached the rank of Havaldar.


NLI DeploymentAs a junior officer in the Northern Light Infantry, Jan fought against India in the Kargil War of 1999.


Tiger Hill in the Kargil Sector had been occupied by around 130 men of 12th NLI (Northern Light Infantry) unit of the Pakistan Army. These men were under the command of Subedar Sikander, who was given the responsibility to capture Indian territory (which was occupied by India in 1971 Indo-Pak war). Havaldar Major Lalak Jan was his 2IC (second in command). The men of 12th NLI were ordered by the Subedar to change their positions while firing back at the Indian forces.





Kargil WarOn 1 July, 1999, the 18th Grenadiers Battalion (India) launched a fierce attack on Tiger Hill, occupied by the Pakistani Army, under cover of heavy artillery shelling around the bunkers. Subedar Sikandar sneaked across the Line of Control and placed his men in well-entrenched positions, and managed to repulse the attack without any loss of life on their own part. Exact casualty figures for the attacking Indian 18th Grenadiers Battalion, are not available.


On the morning of 2 July 1999, hoping to use the cover of the mist, the 18th Grenadiers launched another intense attack on Tiger Hills. Realizing the great difficulty in holding their previous positions that had been spotted and zeroed-in by the Indian artilliery deployed below, Subedar Sikandar ordered his men to retreat to secondary positions around a secret bunker. Once the men were secure, he directed Lalak Jan to descend Tiger Hill and, amidst the Indian Artillery shelling, plant the landmines in the area in front of the Indian forces. Though this was deemed a nearly impossible task by all, the Subedar and the 2IC agreed that this task was very important, if they were to make a dent in the Indian offensive. Planting the landmines was the only way for them to neutralize the Indian armor and artillery, as the men of 12th NLI did not have any heavy/armour-piercing weaponry; their light-attack unguided (RPG-7)s were inadequate for the task. They were hoping that the mist under which's cover the Indians were attacking, would help Lalak Jan as well, and that the Indians would not be expecting such an audacious and surprising move from the men holed up above.


Fighting in MountainsAccepting the daunting task, Lalak Jan descended Tiger Hills in the mist. He was provided as fierce a cover as possible, to keep the Indians distracted. Lalak Jan, born and raised in the foothills of the Himalayan Mountain Ranges in northern Pakistan, used his natural mountaineering abilities to the fullest, and managed to plant the landmines in such a manner that the Indians would encounter them as soon as they tried to move forward to new positions higher up towards the hill.

Lalak Jan returned to 12th NLI's position, having successfully completed this mission.

The trap was now set; The men had to lure the Indian forces into it. Subedar Sikandar told his men to gradually reduce the firing to a standstill.


About two hours after firing ceased from the Pakistan side, the Indians ventured forward, hoping that they'd managed to clear the area of the 12th NLI. The landmines planted by Lalak Jan wrought havoc to their forward movements. The Indians are believed to have suffered heavy casualties, suffering losses in both men and armor. This incident was not publicized by the Indian side however, due to which the exact amount of damage is not known. The damage was severe enough, in any case, that 18th Grenadiers battalion did not attack the Tiger Hills positions for around half a week, until support arrived in the form of another Indian Unit, eight Sikh.


On 6 July, both the 18th Grenadiers battalion and the 8th Sikh launched a combined attack on Tiger Hills, in what many consider one of the fiercest battles of the Kargil Operation. Detachments of Indian soldiers launched an attack from the very high, steep side of the hills. The 12th NLI was not expecting an attack from this side, and it took them by surprise. The NLI fought this battle at a heavy cost. Over half the 12th NLI unit's strength was lost in the fighting that ensued, suffering 80 casualties out of the unit's total strength of around 130. Casualties including Subedar Sikander, who had commanded the unit in this battle so far. In the course of the fighting that ensued, some number of bunker fortifications held by the NLI unit were completely destroyed by the Indians, launching surprise attacks and dropping grenades into them.

Towards the end of the engagement, only Havaldar Lalak Jan and three other men remained. The onslaught of the Indians was continuing and they were rapidly advancing towards capturing the hills. Lalak Jan, now the senior most person around, placed his three men in strategic positions, assigning two to three positions per person, and ordering them to rapidly fire from different positions. These men, pitted against an enemy vastly superior in number and weaponry, managed to repulse the Indian onslaught, in a saga of sheer courage and great determination.




On 7 July 1999, the 18th Grenadiers battalion and the 8th Sikh unit launched yet another combined offensive. This time they succeeded in their attack. Two of Lalak Jan's men were killed, and Lalak Jan and his only other remaining comrade in arms, Bakhmal Jan were both seriously injured. Not giving up, Lalak Jan got hold of a LMG and while Bakhmal Jan provided him with the ammunition, and the two men desperately kept trying to repulse the Indian attack. Lalak Jan's left arm had been rendered useless after receiving bullet wounds to it. Bakhmal Jan, unable to sustain his grave injuries, died while supplying the ammunition to Lalak Jan.

From there on, in one of the most stunning demonstrations of determination and courage in military history.

More Fighting in MountainsAfter the Indian offensive had subsided, reinforcements (50 to 60 men) were sent to Tiger Hill under Captain Amer. When he saw the condition of Lalak Jan he told him to go back to the base camp on account of his severe injuries, his arm being shot and completely limp, and in no condition to be used. Lalak Jan told the captain that he did not want to die on a hospital bed, and would rather die in the battlefield. He reassured his Captain that he should not worry about the bullet wounds in Lalak's arm, that Lalak Jan could still be of some use in the battlefield.


Around this time, soon after Captain Amer's reinforcements arrived, the Indians started shelling from a secret, out-of-sight bunker in an adjacent hill. The command of the handful of troops at Tiger Hill had been taken up by Captain Amer. He realized that the fire was coming from a secret bunker and also directed fire towards it, but zeroing in and targeting the bunker proved exceedingly difficult. The exact reason for the failure of this fire by Captain Amer's forces is not confirmed. Three likely reasons come to mind however. The secret bunker might have been very well designed and protected by the mountainsides, the fire might not have been directed properly or thirdly, the bunker was not in range of the light weaponry possessed by the Pakistanis atop Tiger Hill.


There was only one way left to counter the secret Indian bunker; it had to be blown up from a closer range.

Lalak Jan, despite his injuries, volunteered for the mission, but his plea was rejected by the captain. Having significant experience of the mountains himself, the captain was of the opinion that he would be the best man to do it, himself. The captain relented in the end, on Lalak Jan's persistent insistence that his audacious landmine installation experience and his mountaineering skills would enable him to have a fighting chance to complete this task.


Final Operation and FightLalak Jan put a bag of explosives on his back, and while shouldering an AK-47 descended Tiger Hills for the second time, again amidst heavy Indian shelling. Managing to avoid being seen by the Indian forces, and utilizing his knowledge of the surrounding hills to take cover, he located the secret bunker and threw the explosives inside the bunker.

The bunker, which incidentally was also an ammunition dump, blew up in a very big blast. Lalak Jan managed to take cover, and the Indian Army lost 16 men inside and nearby the bunker. The other Indian soldiers saw Lalak Jan and opened fire on him. Surrounded from all sides by Indian fire, Lalak Jan made a valiant effort to resist and returned fire.


He sustained grave injuries, especially as a result of heavy mortar shelling.

DeathOn 15 September 1999, the commanding officer of 12th NLI sent two Special Service Group Comando groups to Tiger Hills to recover the body of Lalak Jan. The two forces were designated 'Ababeel' and 'Uqaab'(Eagle). Ababeel provided the fire cover while Uqaab went into the destroyed enemy bunker to retrieve the body of Lalak Jan. When his body was found, Havaldar Lalak Jan had his AK-47 firmly clinched to his chest.


Pakistan awarded him the Nishan-i-Haider, Pakistan’s highest military award, for extraordinary gallantry. Only ten soldiers have ever received this honour. Jan was the first person from the Northern Areas of Pakistan to receive the award

Thursday 16 June 2011

Captain Karnal Sher Khan Shaheed



Karnal Sher Khan (1970–1999) was a Pakistani Army officer and one of only 10 recipients of Pakistan's highest gallantry award, the Nishan-e-Haider. He was a Captain in the 12 Northern Light Infantry (NLI) and, previously in 27 Sindh Regiment of the Pakistan.

NameCaptain Sher Khan was born in Nawan Killi, a village in Swabi District of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. Karnal is localised form of Colonel. Karnel Sher Khan's home village of Nawan Kali (means: New Village) has now been named after him as Karnal Sher Killi (Village of Karnal Sher Khan).

Education and careerSher Khan got his early education in his native city and joined Pakistan Air Force as Aero Technician. He got training from PTTS (Pre Trade Training School), a renowned institute which produced two recipients of Highest gallantry award Nishan-e-Haider (Major Raja Aziz Bhatti Shaheed and Captain Karnal Sher Khan Shaheed. When he was serving in PFT Wing PAF Academy, He was selected as Army Officer through ISSB. He rose to the rank of Captain in the 12 Northern Light Infantry (NLI) and, previously in 27 Sindh Regiment of the Pakistan.

Kargil conflictThe government of Pakistan awarded Captain Karnal Sher Khan with Nishan-e-Haider, the country's highest gallantry award. Captain Karnal Sher Khan was posthumously awarded Pakistan's highest gallantry award, the Nishan-e-Haider, for his actions during the Kargil Conflict with India in 1999.

The following is the official statement by the Pakistani Army:

"Captain Karnal Sher Khan emerged as the symbol of mettle and courage during the Kargil conflict on the Line of Control (LoC). He set personal examples of bravery and inflicted heavy losses on the enemy. He defended the five strategic posts, which he established with his Jawan's at the height of some 17,000 feet at Gultary, and repulsed many Indian attacks. After many abortive attempts, the enemy on July 5 ringed the post of Capt. Sher Khan with the help of two battalion and unleashed heavy Mortar firing and managed to capture some part of the post. Despite facing all odds, he led a counter-attack and tried to re- capture the lost parts.But during the course he was hit by the machine-gun fire and embraced Shahadat or martyrdom at the same post. He is the first officer from the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province to be awarded with Nishan-e-Haider

Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz Shaheed



Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz Shaheed was born in Awan family of Pind Malikan (now Mahfuzabad) in Rawalpindi District on October 25, 1944. Muhammad Mahfuz joined Pakistan Army on October 25, 1962 as an infantry soldier.

Incident leading to Martyrdom (Shahadat) At the time of India-Pakistan War of 1971, Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz was serving in Company “A” of 15 Punjab Regiment deployed on the Wagah-Attari Sector. On the night of December 17-18, his company was assigned the task of occupying Phul Kanjri village located in the same sector. Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz was assigned to Platoon No. 3, which was designated as the forward unit in the assault. Thus this Platoon had to face torrential volleys of enemy fire from concrete Pill boxes. When the entire Company “A” was about 70 yards from the Indian position, it was pinned down by an unceasing frontal and cross fire from automatic weapons. On top of that the enemy artillery also opened up its fire with the break of dawn. Mahfuz, whose machine-gun was destroyed by an enemy shell, charged towards the Indian defences. Muhammad Mahfuz advanced towards an enemy bunker whose automatic fire had inflicted heavy casualties. Even though wounded in both legs by shell splinters, when he reached the bunker he stood up and pounced on the enemy, in the encounter he was hit with a bayonet. Although unarmed, he got hold of the enemy and did another bayonet strangling with him. Due to serious injuries he died on the night of 17 December 1971.

His heroic feat led to the success of the Pakistani assault.

For his supreme courage, Lance Naik Muhammad Mahfuz Shaheed was awarded Nishan-i-Haider, the highest Military award of Pakistan

Captain Raja Muhammad Sarwar Khan Bhatti Shaheed



Raja Muhammad Sarwar Khan Bhatti (1910–27 July 1948) was born in Singhori village, Tehsil Gujar Khan, District of Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan. Muhammad Sarwar was a captain in the newly formed Pakistani Army. Commissioned: 1944, Punjab Regiment. In 1947, he volunteered to take part in the battalion organised by the Pakistani Army that entered Kashmir on the order of the then Governor-General Muhammad Ali Jinnah with the object of taking over Kashmir. His regiment managed to outflank the unorganized Indian troops and forced them to retreat out of the parts which are now known as Northern Areas in one of the battles of the First Kashmir War. He was killed by machine gun fire when advancing forward through a barbed wire barricade.

During the Kashmir Operations soon after the birth of Pakistan, as Company Commander of the 2nd Battalion of the Punjab Regiment, Captain Sarwar launched an attack causing heavy casualties against a strongly fortified enemy position in the Uri Sector under heavy machine gun, grenade and mortar fire. But on 27 July 1948, as he moved forward with six of his men to cut their way through a barbed wire barrier, he died when his chest was riddled by a burst of heavy machine gun fire.

In recognition for his valor, Sarwar was postmumously awarded the Nishan-E-Haider, Pakistan's highest military decoration..

In addition Sarwar Shaheed College was named after his honor.

Sawar Muhammad Hussain Janjua Shaheed

Sawar Muhammad Hussain Janjua Shaheed was born in Dhok Pir Bakhsh (now Dhok Muhammad Hussain Janjua named after him in commemoration of his Gallantry) in Gujar Khan on June 18, 1949. He joined Pakistan Army as a driver on September 3, 1966 at a very young age of 17 years. Although he was only a driver he always yearned to participate in active battle.
DeathAt the time of 1971 war (between India and Pakistan) he was attached with an old army unit known as “20 Lancers”. While his unit was engaged in the frontline area of Zafarwal-Shakargarh, he himself never missed an opportunity of taking over a machine-gun and firing on the enemy, unmindful of any danger. It was on December 5, 1971 that while braving intense shelling and direct fire from enemy tanks and infantry, he went from trench to trench delivering ammunition to the frontline soldiers[citation needed]. It was documented by his company men that on the following day, he went out with four fighting patrols and undertook most hazardous missions. However, it was on December 10, 1971 that he spotted the enemy digging in near village Harar Khurd along the minefield laid out by Pakistan Army. He thus immediately informed the second- in-command of his unit. But simultaneously he moved, on his own initiative, from one anti-tank gun to another directing the crew to fire accurately at enemy tanks. On the same day, at 04:00 pm, while directing fire from one of the recoilless rifles, he was hit on the chest by a burst of machine-gun fire from an enemy tank and thus died in action.
Sawar Muhammad Hussain had the distinction of being the first Jawan (a rank of foot soldier in Pakistan Army) to be awarded Nishan-e-Haider for his gallantry

Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas Shaheed



Pilot Officer Rashid Minhas or Rashid Minhas Shaheed, NH, (February 17, 1951–August 20, 1971) was a Pilot Officer in the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) during the 1971 Pakistan-Bangladesh War.[1] Rashid Minhas, a newly commissioned officer at that time, is the only PAF officer who received the highest valor for his actions. He is also the youngest and short-service officer, belonging to the Pakistan Defense Forces's lead aerial warfare service/branch, Pakistan Air Force (PAF), who received the Nishan-e-Haider in 1971.

Early life and educationRashid Minhas belonged to a famous Minhas clan of Rajput. Rashid Minhas was born on February 17, 1951 in Karachi. He belonged to a family that had settled in Gurdaspur from Jammu and Kashmir. After the creation of Pakistan the family migrated to Pakistan and lived near Sialkot. Some had migrated to Sialkot, stayed in the previous locations, or moved to Lahore. Rashid was part of the family group that migrated to Lahore. Mostly they are found in the NorthWest of Lahore, among other places. Rashid spent his early childhood in Lahore. Later the family shifted to Rawalpindi. Rashid had his early education from St Mary's Cambridge School Rawalpindi. Minhas was fascinated with aviation history and technology. He used to collect different models of aircraft and jets. He studied from Saint Mary's Cambridge School, Murree Road, Rawalpindi and completed his Matriculation at the age of 17. He also attended St Patrick's High School, Karachi and then attended Karachi University where he studied Military history and Aviation history.

DeathHaving joined the air force, he was commissioned on 13 March 1971 in the 51st GD(P) Course; on August 20 of that year, he was getting ready to take off in a T-33 trainer in Karachi when a Bengali Instructor pilot, Flight Lieutenant Matiur Rahman, gained his way into the back of the plane. He had been reported to have been watching Minhas closely for many weeks for his being new, young and inexperienced. In mid-air, Rahman knocked Minhas out with the intention of defecting to India to join his compatriots in the Bangladesh Liberation War, along with the plane.

In mid-flight, Minhas regained consciousness, and realized that his plane was being hijacked. He desperately communicated to the PAF Masroor Base at 11:30AM, about his hijacking by Rahman. In his last words which is the conversation between Rashid Minhas and control tower, he gave information about the hijack. The last conversation between control tower and Rashid Minhas was:

0:23 “166 is Hijacked” (Rashid Minhas? Shaheed.

0:30 “166 Hijacked” (Rashid Minhas Shaheed).

0:38 “Hijacked by whom, over” (Control Tower).

0:40 “166 is Hijacked” (Rashid Minhas Shaheed).

0:42 “Hijacked by whom” (Control Tower).

0:50 “By whom, over” (Control Tower).

0:52 “166 is Hijacked” (Rashid Minhas Shaheed) Last Words.

Failing to overcome Matiur Rahman he crashed his own plane to avoid any security breach. The crash site of the T-33 was later found 40 km from the Indian border.

Other AccomplishmentsMinhas was well-known to his commandants and fellow officer's for his intelligence and Alpha grade record. He completed his O levels at the age of 16 with A grades in all of his subjects. After enrolling in the Air Force, he passed out of the PAF Academy with 3rd position and was awarded the Sword of Honor for his performance. Once during his training sessions at the Kamra Airbase he was in a test flight when his T-33 started leaking oil and he was instructed to eject and save himself, but Minhas decided that he would not let the plane crash and then very carefully he managed to land the plane back on the airbase. This act of bravery did not go unnoticed and he was given a letter of recognition by his commandant.

LegacyMinhas was posthumously awarded Pakistan's top military honour, the Nishan-E-Haider, and became the youngest man and the only member of the Pakistan Air Force to win the award. He also became a national hero. The Pakistan Air Force base at Kamra has been renamed in his honour. In Karachihe was honored by the naming of a main street, Rashid Minhas Road, after him. He is one of the most prominent and honored pilots in Pakistan. He has been honored by the Pakistani Media and numerous documentary dramas and films have been made on him. Since his childhood he used to write in his dairy that "We cannot live forever then why don't we sacrifice ourselves on our dear homeland, yes it is an easy job

Major Mohammad Akram Shaheed



Major Muhammad Akram (1938 – 1971), was a Pakistan Army officer who was posthumously awarded the Pakistan military's highest decoration, the Nishan-e-Haider, for his actions during the 1971 Indo-Pak. Akram was sent on several missions in 1971 India-Pakistan War, and was killed in Battle of Hilli, 1971.

Military Career Akram was born in Dinga Village, District of Gujrat, Punjab, while he belonged to the village of Nakka Kalan in the district of Jhelum. Ethnically, he belonged to Awan tribe of Pakistan. In 1959, Akram was accepted in Pakistan Military Academy and graduated from there in 1963. He gained a commissioned in 1963 as part of the Frontier Force Regiment. Akram participated in 1965 Indo-Pak September War as a Captain where he led several successful military operations against Indian Army. Stationed in Lahore, Akram, while commanded, a small company led several decisive operations against the Indian Armed Forces.

In 1969, Akram was promoted as Major. In 1971, as Major of the Pakistan Army, Akram fought in the war with India. In the Battle of Hilli for his leadership, bravery and eventually, rendering the ultimate sacrifice, Major Akram was posthumously awarded the Nishan-e-Haider, Pakistan's highest military award.

Death During the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, the 4th FF Regiment, which Akram commanded, was placed in the forward area of the Hilli district, in what was then East Pakistan. The regiment came under continuous and heavy air, artillery and armour attacks from the Indian Army. For an entire fortnight, despite enemy superiority in both numbers and fire power, Akram and his men repulsed every attack, inflicting heavy casualties on the enemy. Akram died during this battle. Major Muhammad Akram (N.H) was buried in village-Boaldar,Thana/Upozila-Hakimpur(Banglahilly),District-Dinajpur. There is a monument, Major Akram Shaheed Memorial, in the midst of Jhelum city. He is called hero of Hilli. Anjum Sultan Shahbaz famous writer and historian has mentioned him in the book Tareekh-e-Jhelum and Shohdai Jhelum.

Major Tufail Mohammad Shaheed



Tufail Mohammad (1914 – 7 August 1958) was born in Hoshiarpur, Punjab and commissioned in the 16th Punjab Regiment in 1943. On 7 August 1958, Mohammad, a Company Commander in the East Pakistan Rifles, encircled an Indian post, which allegedly violated the internationally recognized boundary between the two countries, in the Lakshmipur area. Though mortally wounded in the hand-to-hand encounter that followed, Mohammed continued to lead his troops until the Indians were driven out, leaving four dead and three prisoners. He died the same day.

Mohammad was posthumously awarded the Nishan-e-Haider, Pakistan's highest military award and is the only person to win the award for an action outside the Indo-Pakistan Wars.

Sir Sayyad Ahmed Khan



Javad-ud Daula, Arif Jang, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, KCSI (also Sayyid Ahmad Khan) (October 17, 1817 –

March 27, 1898), commonly known as Sir Syed, was an Indian educator and politician, and an

Islamic reformer and modernist. Sir Syed pioneered modern education for the Muslim community in

India by founding the Muhammedan Anglo-Oriental College, which later developed into the Aligarh

Muslim University. His work gave rise to a new generation of Muslim intellectuals and politicians

who composed the Aligarh movement to secure the political future of Muslims of India.

In 1842, Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar II revived upon Syed Ahmad Khan the title of Javad-ud Daulah,

conferred upon Syed Ahmad’s grandfather Syed Hadi by Emperor Shah Alam II in about the middle of

the 18th century. The Emperor added to it the additional title of Arif Jang. The conferment of

these titles was symbolic of Syed Ahmad Khan’s incorporation into the nobility of Delhi.

Born into Muslim nobility, Sir Syed earned a reputation as a distinguished scholar while working

as a jurist for the British East India Company. During the Indian Rebellion of 1857 he remained

loyal to the British and was noted for his actions in saving European lives. After the rebellion

he penned the booklet Asbab-e-Baghawat-e-Hind (The Causes of the Indian Mutiny) a daring

critique, at the time, of British policies that he blamed for causing the revolt. Believing that

the future of Muslims was threatened by the rigidity of their orthodox outlook, Sir Syed began

promoting Western-style scientific education by founding modern schools and journals and

organising Muslim intellectuals. Towards this goal, Sir Syed founded the Muhammedan

Anglo-Oriental College in 1875 with the aim of promoting social and economic development of

Indian Muslims.

One of the most influential Muslim politicians of his time, Sir Syed was suspicious of the Indian

independence movement and called upon Muslims to loyally serve the British Raj. He denounced

nationalist organisations such as the Indian National Congress, instead forming organisations to

promote Muslim unity and pro-British attitudes and activities. Sir Syed promoted the adoption of

Urdu as the lingua franca of all Indian Muslims, and mentored a rising generation of Muslim

politicians and intellectuals. Although hailed as a great Muslim leader and social reformer, Sir

Syed remains the subject of controversy for his views on Hindu-Muslim issues.

Do not show the face of Islam to others; instead show your face as the follower of true Islam

representing character, knowledge, tolerance and piety.

Timeline of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan's life




Sir Syed's early group photoSyed Ahmed Khan was born in Delhi, then the capital of the Mughal

Empire. His family is said to have migrated from Herat (now in Afghanistan) in the time of

emperor Akbar, although by other accounts his family descended from Arabia. Many generations of

his family had since been highly connected with the Mughal administration. His maternal

grandfather Khwaja Fariduddin served as wazir in the court of Akbar Shah II. His paternal

grandfather Syed Hadi held a mansab, a high-ranking administrative position and honorary name of

Jawwad Ali Khan in the court of Alamgir II. Sir Syed's father Mir Muhammad Muttaqi was personally

close to Akbar Shah II and served as his personal adviser. However, Sir Syed was born at a time

when rebellious governors, regional insurrections and the British colonialism had diminished the

extent and power of the Mughal state, reducing its monarch to a figurehead status. With his elder

brother Syed Muhammad Khan, Sir Syed was raised in a large house in a wealthy area of the city.

They were raised in strict accordance with Mughal noble traditions and exposed to politics. Their

mother Azis-un-Nisa played a formative role in Sir Syed's life, raising him with rigid discipline

with a strong emphasis on education. Sir Syed was taught to read and understand the Qur'an by a

female tutor, which was unusual at the time. He received an education traditional to Muslim

nobility in Delhi. Under the charge of Hamiduddin, Sir Syed was trained in Persian, Arabic, Urdu

and religious subjects. He read the works of Muslim scholars and writers such as Sahbai, Rumi and

Ghalib. Other tutors instructed him in mathematics, astronomy and Islamic jurisprudence. Sir Syed

was also adept at swimming, wrestling and other sports. He took an active part in the Mughal

court's cultural activities. His elder brother founded the city's first printing press in the

Urdu language along with the journal Sayyad-ul-Akbar. Sir Syed pursued the study of medicine for

several years, but did not complete the prescribed course of study. Until the death of his father

in 1838, Sir Syed had lived a life customary for an affluent young Muslim noble. Upon his

father's death, he inherited the titles of his grandfather and father and was awarded the title

of Arif Jung by the emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar. Financial difficulties put an end to Sir Syed's

formal education, although he continued to study in private, using books on a variety of

subjects. Sir Syed assumed editorship of his brother's journal and rejected offers of employment

from the Mughal court.

CareerHaving recognised the steady decline in Mughal political power, Sir Syed entered the

British East India Company's civil service. He was appointed serestadar at the courts of law in

Agra, responsible for record-keeping and managing court affairs. In 1840, he was promoted to the

title of munshi. In 1858, he was appointed to a high-ranking post at the court in Muradabad,

where he began working on his most famous literary work.

Acquainted with high-ranking British officials, Sir Syed obtained close knowledge about British

colonial politics during his service at the courts. At the outbreak of the Indian rebellion, on

May 10, 1857, Sir Syed was serving as the chief assessment officer at the court in Bijnor.

Northern India became the scene of the most intense fighting. The conflict had left large numbers

of civilians dead. Erstwhile centres of Muslim power such as Delhi, Agra, Lucknow and Kanpur were

severely affected. Sir Syed was personally affected by the violence and the ending of the Mughal

dynasty amongst many other long-standing kingdoms. Sir Syed and many other Muslims took this as a

defeat of Muslim society. He lost several close relatives who died in the violence. Although he

succeeded in rescuing his mother from the turmoil, she died in Meerut, owing to the privations

she had experienced.

Nawab Mohsin ul Mulk, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Justice Syed Mahmood, he was the first Muslim to serve

as a High Court judge in the British Raj.The Causes of the Indian RevoltIn 1859 Sir Syed

Published the booklet Asbab-e-Bhaghawath-e-Hind,(The Causes of the Indian Revolt), in which he

studied the causes of the revolt. In this, his most famous work, he rejected the common notion

that the conspiracy was planned by Muslim élites, who were insecure at the diminishing influence

of Muslim monarchs. Sir Syed blamed the British East India Company for its aggressive expansion

as well as the ignorance of British politicians regarding Indian culture. However, he gained

respect for British power, which he felt would dominate India for a long period of time. Seeking

to rehabilitate Muslim political influence, Sir Syed advised the British to appoint Muslims to

assist in administration.

The pamphlet entitled The Causes of the Indian RevoltMaulana Altaf Hussain Hali wrote, "As soon

as Sir Sayyid reached Muradabad, he began to write the pamphlet entitled The Causes of the Indian

Revolt ( asbaab-e ba;Gaavat-e hind ), in which he did his best to clear the people of India, and

especially the Muslims, of the charge of Mutiny. In spite of the obvious danger, he made a

courageous and thorough report of the accusations people were making against the Government and

refused the theory which the British had invented to explain the causes of the Mutiny.

When the work was finished, without waiting for an English translation, Sir Sayyid sent the Urdu

version to be printed at the Mufassilat Gazette Press in Agra. Within a few weeks, he received

500 copies back from the printers. His friend warned him not to send the pamphlet to Parliament

or to the Government of India. Master Ramchandra's younger brother, Rae Shankar Das, who was

munsif in Muradabad and a great friend of Sir Sayyid, begged him to burn the books rather than

put his life in danger. Sir Sayyid replied that he was bringing these matters to the attention of

the British for the good of his own people, of his country, and of the Government itself. He said

that if he came to any harm while doing something that would greatly benefit the rulers and the

subjects of India alike, he would gladly suffer whatever befell him. When Rae Shankar Das saw

that Sir Sayyid's mind was made up and nothing could be done to change it, he wept and remained

silent. After performing a supplementary prayer and asking God's blessing, Sir Sayyid sent almost

all the 500 copies of his pamphlet to England, one to the Government, and kept the rest himself.

When the Government of India had the book translated and presented before the Council, Lord

Canning, the Governor-General, and Sir Barthold Frere both accepted it as a sincere and friendly

report. The Foreign Secretary, however, severely attacked it, calling it 'an extremely seditious

pamphlet'. He wanted a proper inquiry into the matter and said that the author, unless he could

give a satisfactory explanation, should be harshly dealt with. Since no other member of the

Council agreed with his opinion, his attack did no harm.

Later, Sir Sayyid was invited to attend Lord Canning's Durbar in Farrukhabad, and happened to

meet the Foreign Secretary there. He told Sir Sayyid that he was displeased with the pamphlet and

added that if he had really had the Government's interests at heart, he would not have made his

opinion known in this way throughout the country, but would have communicated it directly to the

Government. Sir Sayyid replied that he had only had five hundred copies printed, the majority of

which he had sent to England, while one had been given to the Government of India, and the

remaining copies were still in his possession. Furthermore, he had the receipt to prove it. He

was aware, he added, that the view of the rulers had been distorted by the stress and anxieties

of the times, which made it difficult to put even the most straightforward problem in its right

perspective. It was for this reason that he had not communicated his thoughts publicly. He

promised that for every copy that could be found circulating in India he would personally pay one

thousand rupees. At first, the Foreign Secretary was not convinced, and asked Sir Sayyid over and

over again if he was sure that no other copy had been distributed in India. Sir Sayyid reassured

him on this matter, and the Foreign Secretary never mentioned it again. Later he became one of

Sir Sayyid's strongest supporters.

Many official translations were made of the Urdu text of The Causes of the Indian Revolt. The one

undertaken by the India Office formed the subject of many discussions and debates. The pamphlet

was also translated by the Government of India and several members of parliament, but no version

was offered to the public. A translation which has been started by a Government official was

finished by Sir Sayyid's great friend, Colonel G. F. I. Graham, and finally published in 1873."

Sir Syed and Mirza Ghalib

The court of Akbar, an illustration from a manuscript of the Ain-e-Akbari1855, he finished his

highly scholarly, very well researched and illustrated edition of Abul Fazl’s Ai’n-e Akbari,

itself an extraordinarily difficult book. Having finished the work to his satisfaction, and

believing that Mirza Asadullah Khan Ghalib was a person who would appreciate his labours, Syed

Ahmad approached the great Ghalib to write a taqriz (in the convention of the times, a laudatory

foreword) for it. Ghalib obliged, but what he did produce was a short Persian poem castigating

the Ai’n-e Akbari, and by implication, the imperial, sumptuous, literate and learned Mughal

culture of which it was a product. The least that could be said against it was that the book had

little value even as an antique document. Ghalib practically reprimanded Syed Ahmad Khan for

wasting his talents and time on dead things. Worse, he praised sky-high the “sahibs of England”

who at that time held all the keys to all the a’ins in this world.

This poem is often referred to but has never translated in English. Shamsur Rahman Faruqi wrote

an English translation. The translation is accurate if lacking the felicity of the original:

“ Good news my friends, this ancient book’s door

Is now open, because of the Syed’s grace and fortune, 1

The eye began to see, the arm found strength That which was wrapped in ancient clothes, now put

on a new dress. 2

And this idea of his, to establish its text and edit the A’in Puts to shame his exalted

capability and potential, 3

He put his heart to a task and pleased himself And made himself an auspicious, free servant. 4

One who isn’t capable of admiring his quality Would no doubt praise him for this task, 5

For such a task, of which this book is the basis Only an hypocrite can offer praise. 6

I, who am the enemy of pretence And have a sense of my own truthfulness, 7

If I don’t give him praise for this task It’s proper that I find occasion to praise. 8

I have nothing to say to the perverse None know what I know of arts and letters, 9

In the whole world, this merchandise has no buyer. What profit could my Master hope from it? 10

It should be said, it’s an excellent inventory So what’s there to see that’s worth seeing? 11

And if you talk with me of Laws and Rules Open your eyes, and in this ancient halting-place 12

Look at the Sahibs of England. Look at the style and practice of these, 13

See what Laws and Rules they have made for all to see What none ever saw, they have produced. 14

Mirza Ghalib who produce this poem“ Science and skills grew at the hands of these skilled ones

Their efforts overtook the efforts of the forebears. 15

This is the people that owns the right to Laws and Rules None knows to rule a land better than

they, 16

Justice and Wisdom they’ve made as one They have given hundreds of laws to India. 17

The fire that one brought out of stone How well these skilled ones bring out from straw! 18

What spell have they struck on water That a vapour drives the boat in water! 19

Sometimes the vapour takes the boat down the sea Sometimes the vapour brings down the sky to the

plains. 20

Vapour makes the sky-wheel go round and round Vapour is now like bullocks, or horses. 21

Vapour makes the ship speed Making wind and wave redundant. 22

Their instruments make music without the bow They make words fly high like birds: 23

Oh don’t you see that these wise people Get news from thousands of miles in a couple of breaths?

24

They inject fire into air And the air glows like embers, 25

Go to London, for in that shining garden The city is bright in the night, without candles. 26

Look at the businesses of the knowledgeable ones: In every discipline, a hundred innovators! 27

Before the Laws and Rules that the times now have All others have become things of yesteryears,

28

Wise and sensitive and prudent one, does your book Have such good and elegant Laws? 29

When one sees such a treasure house of gems Why should one glean corn from that other harvest? 30

Well, if you speak of its style, it’s good No, it’s much better than all else that you seek 31

But every good always has a better too If there’s a head, there’s also a crown for it. 32

Don’t regard that Generous Source as niggardly It’s a Date-Palm which drops sweet light, like

dates. 33

Worshipping the Dead is not an auspicious thing And wouldn’t you too think that it’s no more than

just words? 34

The Rule of silence pleases my heart, Ghalib You spoke well doubtless, not speaking is well too.

35

Here in this world your creed is to worship all the Prophet’s children, Go past praising, your

Law asks you to pray: 36

For Syed Ahmad Khan-e Arif Jang Who is made up entirely of wisdom and splendour 37

Let there be from God all that he might wish for Let an auspicious star lead all his affairs. 38

The poem was unexpected, but it came at the time when Syed Ahmad Khan’s thought and feelings

themselves were inclining toward change. Ghalib seemed to be acutely aware of a

European[English]-sponsored change in world polity, especially Indian polity. Syed Ahmad might

well have been piqued at Ghalib’s admonitions, but he would also have realized that Ghalib’s

reading of the situation, though not nuanced enough, was basically accurate. Syed Ahmad Khan may

also have felt that he, being better informed about the English and the outside world, should

have himself seen the change that now seemed to be just round the corner. Sir Syed Ahmad Khan

never again wrote a word in praise of the Ai’n-e Akbari and in fact gave up taking active

interest in history and archealogy, and became a social reformer.

Scholarly works

First issue of the journal Muhammadan Social Reformer dated 24 December 1870, it was a pioneering

publication initiated by Sir Syed to promote liberal ideas in Muslim society.While continuing to

work as a jurist, Sir Syed began focusing on writing, from the age of 23 (in 1840), on various

subjects (from mechanics to educational issues), mainly in Urdu, where he wrote, at least, 6000

pages. His career as an author began when he published a series of treatises in Urdu on religious

subjects in 1842. He published the book A'thar-as-sanadid (Great Monuments) documenting

antiquities of Delhi dating from the medieval era. This work earned him the reputation of a

cultured scholar. In 1842, he completed the Jila-ul-Qulub bi Zikr-il Mahbub and the

Tuhfa-i-Hasan, along with the Tahsil fi jar-i-Saqil in 1844. These works focused on religious and

cultural subjects. In 1852, he published the two works Namiqa dar bayan masala tasawwur-i-Shaikh

and Silsilat ul-Mulk. He released the second edition of A'thar-as-sanadid in 1854. He also penned

a commentary on the Bible — the first by a Muslim — in which he argued that Islam was the closest

religion to Christianity, with a common lineage from Abrahamic religions. His other writings such

as Loyal Muhammadans of India, Tabyin-ul-Kalam and A Series of Essays on the Life of Muhammad and

Subjects Subsidiary Therein helped to create cordial relations between the British authorities

and the Muslim community.

Throughout his life Syed Ahmad found time for literary and Scholarly pursuits. The range of his

literary and Scholarly interests was very wide: history, politics, archaeology, journalism,

literature, religion and science. The scope of his major writings is indeed amazing, majority are

listed as follows:

Legal works1. Act No. 10 (Stamp Act) 1862.

2. Act No. 14 (Limitation) Act 1859-1864.

3. Act No. 16 (Regarding registration of documents) - Allygurh, 1864.

Religious works4. Ahkam Tu'am Ahl-Kitab, Kanpur, 1868.

5. Al-Du'a Wa'l Istajaba, Agra, 1892.

6. Al-Nazar Fi Ba'z Masa'il Imam Al-Ghazzali, Agra.

7. Izalat ul-Chain as Zi'al Qarnain, Agra, 1889.

8. Zila al-Qulub ba Zikr al-Mahbub, Delhi, 1843.

9. Khulq al-Insan ala ma fi al-Quran, Agra, 1892.

10. Kimiya-i-Sa'dat, 2 fasl, 1883.

11. Mazumm ba nisbat tanazzul ulum-i-diniya wa Arabiya wa falsafa-i- Yunaniya, Agra, 1857.

12. Namiqa fi Bayan Mas'ala Tasawwur al-Shaikh, Aligarh, 1883.

13. Rah-i-Sunnat dar rad-i-bid'at, Aligarh, 1883.

14. Risala Ibtal-i-Ghulami, Agra, 1893.

15. Risala ho wal Mojud, 1880.

16. Risala Tahqiq Lafzi-i-Nassara, 1860.

17. Tabyin-ul-Kalam fi Tafsir-al-turat-wa'l Injil ala Mullat-al-Islam (The Mohomedan Commentary

on the Holy Bible).

18. Tafsir-ul-Qura'n Vol. I Aligarh, 1880, Vol. II Aligarh, 1882, Agra, 1903. Vol. III Aligarh,

1885 Vol. IV Aligarh, 1888 Vol. V Aligarh, 1892. Vol. VI Aligarh, 1895 Vol. VII Agra, 1904.

19. Tafsir al-Jinn Wa'l Jan ala ma fi al-Qur'an, Rahmani Press, Lahore, 1893, Agra, 1891.

20. Tafsir-a-Samawat, Agra.

21. Tahrir fi Usul al-Tafsir, Agra, 1892.

22. Tarjama fawa'id al-afkar fi amal al-farjar, Delhi 1846.

23. Tarqim fi qisa ashab al-kahf wal-Raqim, Agra, 1889.

24. Tasfiyad al'Aquid (Being the correspondence between Syed Ahmad Khan and Maulana Muhammad

Qasim of Deobund). 25.He promote western and eastern education.

Historical works

Title page of Commentary of Quran by Sir Syed Ahmed Khan25. A'in-e-Akbari (Edition with

Illustration), Delhi.

26. Asar-us-Sanadid (i) Syed-ul-Akhbar, 1847, (II) Mata-i-Sultani, 1852.

27. Description des monument de Delhi in 1852, D'a Pre Le Texte Hindostani De Saiyid Ahmad Khan

(tr. by M. Garcin De Tassy), Paris, 1861.

28. Jam-i-Jum, Akbarabad, 1940.

29. Silsilat-ul-Muluk, Ashraf ul Mataba', Delhi, 1852.

30. Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi (Edition), Asiatic Society, Calcutta, 1862.

31. Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri (edition Aligarh, 1864).

Biographical works32. Al-Khutbat al-Ahmadiya fi'l Arab wa'I Sirat al-Muhammadiya : Aligarh, 1900,

English translation, London, 1869-70.

33. Sirat-i-Faridiya, Agra, 1896.

34. Tuhfa-i-Hasan, Aligarh, 1883.

Political works35. Asbab-i-Bhaghwat-i-Hind, Urdu 1858 and English edition, Banaras.

36. Lecture Indian National Congress Madras Par, Kanpur, 1887.

37. Lectures on the Act XVI of 1864, delivered on the 4th Dec., 1864 for the Scientific Society,

Allygurh, 1864.

38. Musalmanon ki qismat ka faisla (taqarir-e-Syed Ahmad Khan wa Syed Mehdi Ali Khan etc.) Agra,

1894.

39. On Hunter's :Our Indian Mussulmans' London, 1872.

40. Present State of Indian Politics (Consisting of lectures and Speeches) Allahabad, 1888.

41. Sarkashi Zilla Binjor, Agra 1858.

Educational works42. Iltimas be Khidmat Sakinan-i-Hindustan dar bad tarraqi ta' lim ahl-i.Hind,

Ghazipore, 1863.

43. Lecture dar bab targhib wa tahris talim itfal-i-Musalmanan, in 1895, Agra 1896.

44. Lecture Madrasaat ul-Ulum Aligarh Key Tarikhi halat aur jadid Waqi'at Par, Agra. 1889.

45. Lecture Ijlas Dahum Muhammadan Educational Conference, Agra, 1896.

46. Lecture Muta'liq Ijlas Yazdahum Muhammadan Educational Conference, Agra, 1896.

47. Majmu'a Resolution Haye dah sala (Resolutions passed by the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental

Educational Conference from 1886 to 1895) ed. by Sir Syed Ahmad, Agra, 1896.

48. Report Salana (Annual Report of the Boarding House of Madrasat-ul- Ulum 1879-1880).

Sir Syed with his son Syed Mahmood, grand son Syed Ross Masood, and some admirers.Collected

works49. Khutut-i-Sir Syed, ed Ross Masud, 1924.

50. Majuma Lecture Kaye Sir Syed ed. Munshi Sirajuddin, Sadhora 1892.

51. Maqalat-i-Sir-Syed ed. by 'Abdullah Khvesgri, Aligarh, 1952.

52. Maqalat-i-Sir Syed, ed. By Muhammad Ismail, Lahore,

53. Makatib-i-Sir Syed, Mustaq Husain, Delhi, 1960.

54. Maktubat-i-Sir Syed, Muhammad Ismail Panipati, Lahore, 1959.

55. Makummal Majumua Lectures wa speeches. ed. Malik Fazaluddin, Lahore, 1900.

56. Muktubat al-Khullan ed. Mohd. Usman Maqbul, Aligarh 1915.

57. Tasanif-i-Ahmadiya (Collection of Syed Ahmad Khan's works on religions topics) in 8 parts.

Miscellaneous58. On the Use of the Sector (Urdu), Syed-ul-Akbar, 1846.

59. Qaul-i-Matin dar Ibtal-i-Harkat i Zamin, Delhi, 1848.

60. Tashil fi Jar-a-Saqil, Agra, 1844.

61. Ik Nadan Khuda Parast aur Dana dunyadar Ki Kahani, Badaon, 1910.

62. Kalamat-ul-Haqq, Aligarh

Journals, Reports Proceedings, Etc.1. Tehzeeb-ul-Ikhlaq.

2. Aligarh Institute Gazette.

3. Proceedings of the Muhammadans Educational Conference.

4. An Account of the Loyal Muhammadans of India, Parts I, II, III Moufussel Press, Meerut, 1860.

5. Proceedings of the Scientific Society.

6. Bye-Laws of the Scientific Society.

7. Addresses and speeches relating to the Muhammedan Anglo-Oriental College in Aligarh

(1875–1898) ed. Nawab Mohsin-ul-Mulk, Aligarh, 1898.

Muslim reformerThe motto of Aligarh University, Taught man what he did not know. (Qur'an 96:5)

Through the 1850s, Syed Ahmed Khan began developing a strongest passion for education. While

pursuing studies of different subjects including European [jurisprudence], Sir Syed began to

realise the advantages of Western-style education, which was being offered at newly established

colleges across India. Despite being a devout Muslim, Sir Syed criticised the influence of

traditional dogma and religious orthodoxy, which had made most Indian Muslims suspicious of

British influences. Sir Syed began feeling increasingly concerned for the future of Muslim

communities. A scion of Mughal nobility, Sir Syed had been reared in the finest traditions of

Muslim élite culture and was aware of the steady decline of Muslim political power across India.

The animosity between the British and Muslims before and after the rebellion (Independence War)

of 1857 threatened to marginalise Muslim communities across India for many generations. Sir Syed

intensified his work to promote co-operation with British authorities, promoting loyalty to the

Empire amongst Indian Muslims. Committed to working for the upliftment of Muslims, Sir Syed

founded a modern madrassa in Muradabad in 1859; this was one of the first religious schools to

impart scientific education. Sir Syed also worked on social causes, helping to organise relief

for the famine-struck people of the North-West Frontier Province in 1860. He established another

modern school in Ghazipur in 1863.

Upon his transfer to Aligarh in 1864, Sir Syed began working wholeheartedly as an educator. He

founded the Scientific Society of Aligarh, the first scientific association of its kind in India.

Modelling it after the Royal Society and the Royal Asiatic Society, Sir Syed assembled Muslim

scholars from different parts of the country. The Society held annual conferences, disbursed

funds for educational causes and regularly published a journal on scientific subjects in English

and Urdu. Sir Syed felt that the socio-economic future of Muslims was threatened by their

orthodox aversions to modern science and technology. He published many writings promoting

liberal, rational interpretations of In face of pressure from religious Muslims, Sir Syed avoided

discussing religious subjects in his writings, focusing instead on promoting education.

On the pre-colonial system he said "The rule of the former emperors and rajas was neither in

accordance with the Hindu nor the Mohammadan religion. It was based on nothing but tyranny and

oppression; the law of might was that of right; the voice of the people was not listened to"

(Bipan Chandra: India's struggle for independence)

Advocacy of UrduSee also: Hindi-Urdu controversy

Sir Syed Ahmed Khan in PunjabThe onset of the Hindi-Urdu controversy of 1867 saw the emergence of

Sir Syed as a political leader of the Muslim community. He became a leading Muslim voice opposing

the adoption of Hindi as a second official language of the United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh).

Sir Syed perceived Urdu as the lingua franca of Muslims. Having been developed by Muslim rulers

of India, Urdu was used as a secondary language to Persian, the official language of the Mughal

court. Since the decline of the Mughal dynasty, Sir Syed promoted the use of Urdu through his own

writings. Under Sir Syed, the Scientific Society translated Western works only into Urdu. The

schools established by Sir Syed imparted education in the Urdu medium. The demand for Hindi, led

largely by Hindus, was to Sir Syed an erosion of the centuries-old Muslim cultural domination of

India. Testifying before the British-appointed education commission, Sir Syed controversially

exclaimed that "Urdu was the language of gentry and Hindi that of the vulgar." His remarks

provoked a hostile response from Hindu leaders, who unified across the nation to demand the

recognition of Hindi.

The success of the Hindi movement led Sir Syed to further advocate Urdu as the symbol of Muslim

heritage and as the language of all Indian Muslims. His educational and political work grew

increasingly centred around and exclusively for Muslim interests. He also sought to persuade the

British to give Urdu extensive official use and patronage. His colleagues such as Mohsin-ul-Mulk

and Maulvi Abdul Haq developed organisations such as the Urdu Defence Association and the Anjuman

Taraqqi-i-Urdu, committed to the perpetuation of Urdu. All these colleagues led efforts that

resulted in the adoption of Urdu as the official language of the Hyderabad State and as the

medium of instruction in the Osmania University. To Muslims in northern and western India, Urdu

had become an integral part of political and cultural identity. However, the division over the

use of Hindi or Urdu further provoked communal conflict between Muslims and Hindus in India.

On April 1, 1869 he went, along with his son Syed Mahmood, to England, where he was awarded the

Order of the Star of India from the British government on August 6. Travelling across England, he

visited its colleges and was inspired by the culture of learning established after the

Renaissance. Sir Syed returned to India in the following year determined to build a "Muslim

Cambridge." Upon his return, he organised the "Committee for the Better Diffusion and Advancement

of Learning among Muhammadans" (Muslims) on December 26, 1870. Sir Syed described his vision of

the institution he proposed to establish in an article written sometime in 1872 and re-printed in

the Aligarh Institute Gazette of April 5, 1911:

I may appear to be dreaming and talking like Shaikh Chilli, but we aim to turn this MAO College

into a University similar to that of Oxford or Cambridge. Like the churches of Oxford and

Cambridge, there will be mosques attached to each College… The College will have a dispensary

with a Doctor and a compounder, besides a Unani Hakim. It will be mandatory on boys in residence

to join the congregational prayers (namaz) at all the five times. Students of other religions

will be exempted from this religious observance. Muslim students will have a uniform consisting

of a black alpaca, half-sleeved chugha and a red Fez cap… Bad and abusive words which boys

generally pick up and get used to, will be strictly prohibited. Even such a word as a "liar" will

be treated as an abuse to be prohibited. They will have food either on tables of European style

or on chaukis in the manner of the Arabs… Smoking of cigarette or huqqa and the chewing of betels

shall be strictly prohibited. No corporal punishment or any such punishment as is likely to

injure a student's self-respect will be permissible… It will be strictly enforced that Shia and

Sunni boys shall not discuss their religious differences in the College or in the boarding house.

At present it is like a day dream. I pray to God that this dream may come true."

Signatures of Sir syedBy 1873, the committee under Sir Syed issued proposals for the construction

of a college in Aligarh. He began publishing the journal Tahzib al-Akhlaq (Social Reformer) to

spread awareness and knowledge on modern subjects and promote reforms in Muslim society. Sir Syed

worked to promote reinterpretation of Muslim ideology in order to reconcile tradition with

Western education. He argued in several books on Islam that the Qur'an rested on an appreciation

of reason and natural law, making scientific inquiry important to being a good Muslim. Sir Syed

established a modern school in Aligarh and, obtaining support from wealthy Muslims and the

British, laid the foundation stone of the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College on May 24, 1875. He

retired from his career as a jurist the following year, concentrating entirely on developing the

college and on religious reform. Sir Syed's pioneering work received support from the British.

Although intensely criticised by orthodox religious leaders hostile to modern influences, Sir

Syed's new institution attracted a large student body, mainly drawn from the Muslim gentry and

middle classes. The curriculum at the college involved scientific and Western subjects, as well

as Oriental subjects and religious education. The first chancellor was Sultan Shah Jahan Begum, a

prominent Muslim noblewoman, and Sir Syed invited an Englishman, Theodore Beck, to serve as the

first college principal. The college was originally affiliated with Calcutta University but was

transferred to the Allahabad University in 1885. Near the turn of the 20th century, it began

publishing its own magazine and established a law school. In 1920, the college was transformed

into a university.

Political careerIn 1878, Sir Syed was nominated to the Viceroy's Legislative Council. He

testified before the education commission to promote the establishment of more colleges and

schools across India. In the same year, Sir Syed founded the Muhammadan Association to promote

political co-operation amongst Indian Muslims from different parts of the country. In 1886, he

organised the All India Muhammadan Educational Conference in Aligarh, which promoted his vision

of modern education and political unity for Muslims. His works made him the most prominent Muslim

politician in 19th century India, often influencing the attitude of Muslims on various national

issues. He supported the efforts of Indian political leaders Surendranath Banerjea and Dadabhai

Naoroji to obtain representation for Indians in the government and civil services. In 1883, he

founded the Muhammadan Civil Service Fund Association to encourage and support the entry of

Muslim graduates into the Indian Civil Service (ICS). While fearful of the loss of Muslim

political power owing to the community's backwardness, Sir Syed was also averse to the prospect

of democratic self-government, which would give control of government to the Hindu-majority

population:

"At this time our nation is in a bad state in regards education and wealth, but God has given us

the light of religion and the Quran is present for our guidance, which has ordained them and us

to be friends. Now God has made them rulers over us. Therefore we should cultivate friendship

with them, and should adopt that method by which their rule may remain permanent and firm in

India, and may not pass into the hands of the Bengalis… If we join the political movement of the

Bengalis our nation will reap a loss, for we do not want to become subjects of the Hindus instead

of the subjects of the "people of the Book…"

Legacy

Sir Syed's house in the university campusSir Syed Ahmed Khan lived the last two decades of his

life in Aligarh, regarded widely as the mentor of 19th- and 20th century Muslim intellectuals and

politicians. He remained the most influential Muslim politician in India, with his opinions

guiding the convictions of a large majority of Muslims. Battling illnesses and old age, Sir Syed

died on March 27, 1898. He was buried besides Sir Syed Masjid inside the campus of the Aligarh

university. His funeral was attended by thousands of students, Muslim leaders and British

officials. Sir Syed is widely commemorated across South Asia as a great Muslim reformer and

visionary.

At the same time, Sir Syed sought to politically ally Muslims to the British government. An

avowed loyalist of the British Empire, Sir Syed was nominated as a member of the Civil Service

Commission in 1887 by Lord Dufferin. In 1888, he established the United Patriotic Association at

Aligarh to promote political co-operation with the British and Muslim participation in the

government. Syed Ahmed Khan was knighted by the British government in 1888 and in the following

year he received an LL.D. honoris causa from the Edinburgh University.

The university he founded remains one of India's most prominent institutions. Prominent alumni of

Aligarh include Muslim political leaders Maulana Mohammad Ali, Abdur Rab Nishtar, Maulana Shaukat

Ali and Maulvi Abdul Haq, who is hailed in Pakistan as Baba-e-Urdu (Father of Urdu). The first

two Prime Ministers of Pakistan, Liaquat Ali Khan and Khawaja Nazimuddin, as well as the late

Indian President Dr. Zakir Hussain, are amongst Aligarh's most famous graduates. In India, Sir

Syed is commemorated as a pioneer who worked for the socio-political upliftment of Indian

Muslims, Sir Syed is also hailed as a founding father of Pakistan for his role in developing a

Muslim political class independent of Hindu-majority organisations. The Sir Syed University of

Engineering and Technology was established in honour of Sir Syed in Karachi and is a leading

technical institution in Pakistan. Furthermore, Sir Syed Government Girls College in Karachi,

Pakistan is also named in the honour of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan. Today he has family living in

Denmark, India, Pakistan and UK.

Criticism

Sir Syed's gravesiteSupporters of Sir Syed contend that his political vision gave an independent

political expression to the Muslim community, which aided its goal of securing political power in

India. His philosophy guided the creation of the All India Muslim League in 1906, as a political

party separate from the Congress. Sir Syed's ideas inspired both the liberal, pro-British

politicians of the Muslim League and the religious ideologues of the Khilafat struggle. The

Muslim League remained at odds with the Congress and continued to advocate the boycott of the

Indian independence movement. In the 1940s, the student body of Aligarh committed itself to the

establishment of Pakistan and contributed in large measure to the activities of the Muslim

League. Sir Syed's patronage of Urdu led to its widespread use amongst Indian Muslim communities

and following the Partition of India its adoption as the official language of Pakistan, even

though Bengali and Punjabi were more prevalent at the time

Monday 30 May 2011

Major Raja Aziz Bhatti Shaheed

Major Raja Aziz Bhatti (1928 - September 10, 1965)  was a Hong Kong-born Pakistan Army's Staff officer who received Pakistan's highest award for valor. He was born in Hong Kong in 1928. He moved to Pakistan before it became independent in 1947, living in the village of Ladian, in the district of Gujrat. There he enlisted with the newly formed Pakistani Army and was commissioned to the Punjab Regiment in 1950.
Early life and army careerHe was from a Muslim Rajput family. His father's name was Master Abdullah Bhatti, and his mother's name was Bibi Amna. . . He had four brothers, Nazir, Bashir, Sardar and Rashid, and two sisters, Rashida and Tahira. His brother Bashir was killed during the Second World War by the Japanese while leaving Hong Kong. He himself had six children, four sons named Major Zafar Javed Bhatti, Dr Zulfiquar Ahmad Bhatti, Rafique Ahmad Bhatti, and Iqbal Javed Bhatti, and two daughters named Riffat Bhatti and Zeenat Bhatti. Throughout his career, he was a brilliant officer and stood out in his class. He did very well at the Academy and was awarded the Sword of Honour best in his year's batch of 300 officers, and the Norman Medal. He received his honours from Liaquat Ali Khan, the first Prime Minister of Pakistan, who was later assassinated.
Indo-Pak War 1965Major Raja Aziz Bhatti was posted in the Burki area of Lahore sector. As the company commander, Major Bhatti chose to move his platoon forward under constant firing from Indian tanks and artillery. For three or more days he went without rest. He resisted for five days and nights defending a Pakistani outpost on the strategic BRB canal.
Martyrdom and LegacyOn 6 September 1965, as a Company Commander in the Burki area of the Lahore sector, Major Raja Aziz Bhatti choose to stay with his forward platoon under incessant artillery and tank attacks for five days and nights in the defence of the strategic BRB Canal. Throughout, undaunted by constant fire from enemy small arms, tanks and artillery. He was reorganizing his company and directing the gunners to shell the enemy positions. In order to watch every move of the enemy, he had to place himself in an elevated position, where he was exposed to Indian fury. He led his men from the front under constant attack from Indian Artillery batteries. Although he tried to counter every Indian offensive in his area, he was hit by an enemy tank shell in the chest while watching the enemy's moves, and embraced martyrdom on 11 September 1965.
A day before his Shahadat (Martyrdom), the commanding officer had sent to him word that since he had been fighting untiringly for the last five days and nights, he should take a little rest and that another officer was being sent to replace him. Major Aziz, who was filled with a battle spirit and the will for martyrdom replied, "Do not recall me. I don't want to go back. I will shed the last drop of my blood in the defence of my dear homeland".
He is buried at his village in Ladian in the Gujrat district.
Each year, Major Bhatti is honoured in Pakistan on 6 September, also known as Defence Day of Pakistan. Major Raja Aziz Bhatti was awarded the Nishan-e-Haider, the nation's highest military award for gallantry for the exemplary courage he displayed till his Martyrdom.

Major Shabbir Sharif Shaheed

Major Shabbir Sharif (born April 28, 1943) was a Pakistani officer who received both the Sitara-e-Jurat and Nishan-e-Haider for his bravery.
Early life and military careerSharif was born April 28, 1943 in Kunjah, Gujrat District) completed his O Levels from St. Anthony's High School, Lahore and while he was at Government College Lahore that he received a call to join Pakistan Military Academy (PMA) Kakul. He was commissioned in Pakistan Army on April 19, 1964 and after successfully completing his training, including a receipt of Sword of Honor, he was posted to the 6th Battalion of the Frontier Force Regiment.
Attack on Gurmakhera BridgeThe General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi launched an attack on India from the western front (West Pakistan) on 3rd December 1971. The primary purpose of the attack was to force India on transferring their military strength in East Pakistan to the West, easing pressure on the East. Before the transfer, it was expected that the West Pakistani forces would gather enough territory to negotiate with India after the war for areas in the East. It was also expected that if the Western front attack was successful, it would cause India to pull out of the war due to severe loss of territory. While the Pakistani attack commenced in the localities of Azad Kashmir, Chamb, Sulemanki, the area inclusive and surrounding Shakargarh (Pakistan) and Rahim Yar Khan, was to be defended. During a defensive posture, the army in this area was supposed to facilitate the launch of the Army Reserves, a 5 Division strong section of the Pakistan Army which was commanded by Lt. Gen. Tikka Khan. Even at Solemanki, two companies (100 men each) of 6 Frontier Force, one commanded by Sharif, were initially supposed to make the attack by the Army Reserves possible by making sure that a certain obstacle was removed.
The obstacle was created by India to prevent Pakistani forces from penetrating into Indian territory. They had created an artificial ridge (small mountain), steep on the Pakistani side, but with a low inclination towards the Indian side. This was to prevent the Pakistani forces from easily climbing up the ridge, whereas the Indians could do so with ease. Result being that the Indians could get an aerial advantage over Pakistan. In front of the ridge on the Pakistani side, there was also a river dug up. This was to slow down the Pakistani forces and also to prevent any tanks or heavy artillery from entering Indian territory. There were only two bridges which were making any vehicular movement across the river/ridge possible and India was controlling them both. Inside the ridge there were camouflaged cemented bunkers which would enable the Indians to fire on any Pakistani troops.
It was extremely important for Pakistan to neutralize this ridge, for it would not only pave the way for the Pakistani attack, but it would also make sure that the Indians themselves cannot attack through this area. Also, since the ridge and river were brilliant constructions by the Indian army, it would serve Pakistan well during the course of the war if it came in their hands, as they would then get the aerial advantage. The ridge was called Saboona Ridge, and the bridge attacked was called Gurmakhera Bridge.
At 5:45 PM, 3rd December, 1971 Sharif launched the attack against Gurmakhera Bridge. Before reaching the bridge Shabir's men had to pass next to the Indian village of Beriwala. This village was reasonably well protected by the Indian Army, and they had also installed landmines in the region next to it for the inconvenience of bypassing troops. Bravo Company knew that there were landmines in the region, but a safe route through was not known. In practice, Bravo company passed through this area safely.
When the company reached the bridge, Farooq Afzal was given the task to take a few men and launch the initial attack. Afzal hence departed from the rest of the party and took a few men closer to the bridge. Two Indian soldiers could be seen standing in front of the bridge. When the Pakistani soldiers killed these men, they were suprised by fire from camouflaged Indian bunkers overlooking the bridge, two of which had the entire bridge area under their firing range. The Indians burst fire upon the Pakistan soldiers hence retarding their progress.
After asking Sharif by radio to provide him with covering fire, Afzal decided to attack the bridge from the front despite the Indian firepower. Breaking up his men into a group of three, he told them to attack with the slogan of Allah O Akbar, basically to distract the Indians from three different sides, hoping that at least one of the three would crawl up to the bridge and reach the area directly beneath the bunkers, where the Indian guns could not reach. The plan was successful, but in the process 6 Pakistani soldiers were killed. Having reached directly beneath the two bunkers which were covering the bridge, the Pakistani soldiers took them down by lobbing hand grenades inside. Once the two bunkers were neutralized, Sharif and his men joined Afzal. It was time to destroy the rest of the bunkers.
An intense battle developed as the Pakistani soldiers started raiding the bunkers. In some cases where the Indian soldiers finished their ammunition, they started throwing out their wireless sets on the Pakistanis. Hand to hand combat was also seen occasionally, while in a few cases the Indians ran away, leaving their supplies behind. The most common scene, however, was one in which grenades were lobbed out, and if the Pakistanis survived they would in turn lob one back in. Sharif also had to clear two bunkers himself. While at the first one, he stood next to the bunker and called out the personnel inside to come out. The usual happened and a grenade was tossed out. Sharif, without being able to see properly due to the darkness, reached out, got hold of the explosive, and threw it back inside, stunning the two other men who were neutralizing the bunkers with him. This action was to become the topic of discussion in the entire company for the next two to three hours, and he was unfairly criticised later for being too close to the bunkers in the first place. However, if Sharif hadn't done this, he would have lost his right arm and leg at least. The second bunker was cleared without any daredevil tricks.The entire operation of clearing the bunkers and taking control of the Saboona Ridge took 30 minutes. Shabir then took out the signal gun and fired a success signal straight up in the air. The other companies were now aware that Sharif and his men had taken control of the Gurmakhera Bridge and the Saboona Ridge. The other companies were to proceed with their attacks, one of which involved capturing the Beriwala village that Sharif had bypassed earlier. It was pitch dark. Sharif and a few men started collecting the bodies of the Pakistani soldiers who had died in the assault. Digging of new bunkers, this time on the opposite side of the ridge than the one facing Pakistan also began simultaneously. It was at that time that an old man's voice was heard from a distance. "We need to go back to Gurmakhera village. The Muslims have attacked Beriwala." Shabbir went closer to the old man. The man could not recognize the Pakistani army uniform due to the darkness. He believed he was talking to an Indian soldier. "I brought my son's barat (wedding procession) to Beriwala in the afternoon. The Muslims have captured the village. We had to run during the rukhsati (last ritual of the wedding)." "Don't you know that there is a war going on?" Shabbir asked in Punjabi. "This is a silly time to have a wedding, that too when you are so close to the border." "Please protect us. I have a whole procession with me here. Even the girl's family is here. We need to get back to our village. The Muslims are coming in this direction." Sharif decided not to waste time, or unnecessarily panic the old fellow. "We will take care of the Muslims. You hurry up and get all your people across. And listen to the radio more frequently for any important announcements." He then called alerted all of his people manning the positions at the bridge that a wedding procession was going to be passing through, and there should be no fire on it. While the procession was crossing over the ridge, a soldier asked Sharif: "Sir. These people are legitimate POWs. Why are we letting them cross?" Shabbir smiled. "Have a heart soldier. This is the happiest day of their lives. Let's not make them spend it inside a cell." When the news of the Pakistani attack reached the opposing brigade commander, Brig. Surjeet Singh, he immediately ordered the Delta company of 4 Jat Regiment (150 men), and a squadron of T-54 tanks to recapture the lost land, specifically the Saboona Ridge and the Gurmakhera Bridge. Although the number of soldiers in the attacking force was more than Shabbir's men, it was the lack of any armour (tanks) on the Pakistani side that made this move appear to be extremely threatening. At 11:00 PM, one of Shabbir's men informed him that he could hear tanks approaching the Gurmakhera Bridge. After Shabbir himself confirmed the noises, he positioned his rocket launchers near the bridge. There were three rocket launchers at his disposal, and two men were required to man each one. There was also some ammunition that had been taken from the defeated Indian forces on the ridge. Two of the rocket launchers were placed in such a manner that the tanks would have to go past them before they could come near the Gurmakhera Bridge or the Saboona Ridge. The third was positioned near Shabbir, to be used as a back up in case the first two failed. When the tanks eventually came in pitch darkness, Shabbir was stunned to see that they passed by the first two positions without any fire from the Pakistani soldiers. Shabbir immediately called the men through wireless, and asked them why they didn't shoot? "Sir, these are Pakistani tanks," a soldier replied from the other side. "No they are not," Shabbir screamed, "Why would our tanks come from the side of the other bridge? That is not in Pakistani control. And I have not been informed of their arrival either from our headquarter. Shoot!" Despite the clarification, there was so much confusion amongst the ranks that no one fired. Shabbir knew that if these had been Pakistani tanks they would have crossed over the ridge 3 km to the West and come as a reinforcement on the Indian side. He got hold of the rocket launcher which was near him, and fired at one of the tanks. When the tank caught flames and illuminated the scene, Sikhs were seen coming out of it. It was at that time that the entire Pakistani force started firing on the Indians. The Indian foot soldiers were closer to the tanks, and they could be easily spotted due to the flames and also due to the aerial advantage that the Pakistani forces had. From the initial 14 tanks that were ordered to attack, only 8 had managed to reach the bridge, and 4 of them had been destroyed in the first 5 minutes of the battle. The others too were safe only because they were out of range of the rocket launchers and Anarga grenades (mounted on G3 rifles) which were at the disposal of the Pakistanis. These adverse circumstances made anything else but the Indian retreat a nonviable option. During this skirmish, 10 Pakistanis were killed and 13 injured, while on the Indian side there were 43 killed, numerous injured and 10 were made POWs, including an officer. Despite the victory, Sharif knew that this was only the beginning, and that having invested so much time in the development of the ridge, the Indians would definitely try to retake it. He immediately contacted the battalion headquarters and asked for further ammunition and landmines. Another mystery surrounding the situation was why the Indians had not blown away Gurmakhera Bridge, which is usual in such war conditions. Around 4:00 AM, an ammunition jeep arrived at the site. There were no confusions on this occasion about its origin. In between, there had been a small attack on Sharif and his positions, but had been easily repulsed as the Indians were much less in number, and there were no tanks involved. When day broke, a search was carried out to find out any Indian soldiers hiding in the captured area. 55 men were rounded up, 3 being officers. Add to these the 10 POWs captured the last night, and Shabbir now had 65 POWs in all. "We should organize a party that escorts them back to our headquarters," an officer suggested to Shabbir. "It is a long walk. Plus I need every one of my men to be here. No point in unnecessarily tiring my men," Shabbir replied. "But they have to be sent back, we cannot keep an eye on them over here forever." After a quiet moment, Shabbir said to the officer: "Ask them to take off their shoes" "What? Shoes?" exclaimed the officer in confusion. "What are we going to do with their shoes?" "Have you ever tried to walk in this area without your shoes?" Shabbir asked. "I have, and I tell you, it is next to impossible to go far without them. Firstly you cannot run very fast, and chances of getting serious injuries on the foot are very high." The officer assembled all the Indian POWs, and asked them to take off their shoes. "They will try to run in any case," the officer privately remarked to Shabbir. "Yes I know," Shabbir said, "I will take care of that as well." He then addressed the Indians. "Listen, you see that tree. You will make a line, put your hands above your heads and run to that tree. Our headquarter is over there. Tell them that you will have been sent by Shabbir Sharif. Now, if anyone tries to run away, or break away from the line, I will shoot him and also the man in front and behind him. From this height I will be able to see all that is happening. If everyone starts running at the same time, I will ask my men here to take part in some duck shooting and we will shoot all. So do not push me." The POWs reached the headquarters without any escort. None tried to escape. Once the POWs had been sent back, Shabbir's men searched the bunkers thoroughly. A wireless set was found, and although it had fixed frequency, the Indians had forgotten to change it during the attack. This gave a tremendous advantage to Shabbir, as he could now listen to the plans that were being made on the Indian side to recapture Gurmakhera Bridge. The other interesting item that was found was a bundle of Indian currency. This was perhaps the salary that was to be distributed amongst the Indian soldiers but had not been done so due to the Pakistani attack. Shabbir ordered the currency to be sent back to the headquarters so that they could give it back after the war, although due to the lack of firewood, a small amount of the currency was burnt to make tea. At 8:30 PM on 4th Dec. 1971, the Indians (4 Jat Regiment) attacked again with a squadron of T-54 tanks. Shabbir knew that they were coming, courtesy the wireless set that had been captured. He was also in a much better position ammunition wise, with now having 102 millimeter anti tank guns, and landmines. The fight took place for only 30 minutes, with the Indians retreating with 14 dead, 21 injured and 8 MIAs (missing in action). The Pakistani side suffered minor injuries but no casualty. Having suffered three defeats in their effort to retake the Gurmakhera Bridge or the Saboona Ridge, the Indians finally launched a major attack on Shabbir's men on the night of 5th Dec 1971. This attack had the support of 4 Jat and 3 Assam regiments, and T-54 tanks amidst heavy artillery shelling. This was the biggest attack to date on the site, with around 800 men from the Indian side being involved. A company commander from the 4 Jat Regiment, Major Narayan Singh, had sworn before going on this attack that he would either retake the bridge, or would never return. Narayan Singh was also interested in defeating Shabbir Sharif, as for the last two days he had been hearing from his own men that the Pakistani side had a very tough commander with them (something which Singh could not afford to have if he was to keep the morale of his men high). While the battle was going on, Narayan Singh, with a few men, came very close to Shabbir's position. "Where is Shabbir Sharif?" he called out, "If he has the courage, he should come out right now and face me like a man." Shabbir Sharif, being as hot headed as Singh, left his position and jumped in front of him upon the call. Perhaps Narayan Singh could not make out that it was Shabbir Sharif, as it was very dark, and he lobbed a grenade in his direction (it doesn't make sense for him to call Sharif out and throw a grenade at him). The grenade exploded a few feet away from Shabbir, and his shirt caught fire. A few Pakistani soldiers also came out and tried to put out the fire, as Shabbir himself was only obsessed with Narayan Singh's call. Seeing the Pakistani soldiers coming out, some of the Indians accompanying Singh were about to open fire when Singh stopped them. "No firing," he said, "This is a man-to-man fight." Shabbir too, for his part, told his men to step back. The fire on his shirt had been extinguished. Both the Indian and Pakistani soldiers stepped back, but at the same time never took their guns off each other, or their fingers off the triggers. A hand to hand combat followed between Sharif and Singh. The soldiers in the direct vicinity were standing close by as armed spectators. The rest of the soldiers (on the ridge) were at the same time involved in the fierce battle that was taking place due to the Indian attack. Singh had his sten gun in his hand, and Shabbir held his wrist to prevent him from firing. After a short struggle, Shabbir managed to throw Singh on the ground and put his knee on his chest. Taking the sten gun from his hand, he emptied it in Singh's chest. While the Pakistani soldiers came to Sharif to check whether he was all right, those accompanying Singh disappeared in the darkness. The attack subsided yet again in an Indian retreat, although this was done after testing Shabbir's men to their fullest of
capabilities. During this attack, there were 3 killed and 11 injured on the Pakistan side, while there were 19 killed, 45 injured, and 34 taken as POWs on the Indian side. 9 Indian tanks were also destroyed in this attack by the Pakistani artillery shelling and anti tank guns (2 or 3 of these tanks were rendered useless for they got stuck in the land before they were taken out). Later, it was revealed that Major Narayan Singh was given Vir Chakra by India, a medal that is equivalent to the Pakistani Sitara-e-Jurrat, for his performance on the battlefield in 1971. Shabbir's right shoulder was badly burnt due to the fire that he had caught while fighting with Singh. When asked by one of his subordinates to go back and get some treatment, he said: "I didn't leave men fighting on the battlefield when I was not responsible for them. This time around I am their commander. Do you think I am going to go back leaving these men who I am supposed to command?" He was referring to the 1965 war, when he, as an ordinary Lieutenant, had been injured severely in the arm. Having gone back to the hospital to treatment, his arm was put in plaster and he was told that he could not take part in the war anymore. He, however, escaped from the hospital and went to the battlefront, where he fought the rest of the war with one arm in plaster! The 5th December attack created a lot of despondency amongst the Indian forces. Terming it a crisis, both GOC Major Gen. Ram Singh, and his Artillery Advisor G.S. Rain took effective charge from Brigadier Surjeet Singh. The Indians attacked yet again at 11:00 AM on 6th Dec. 1971. Shabbir was manning a 102 millimeter gun when a tank fired in his direction. He fired back at the tank and took it out. With a second tank lurking nearby, Shabbir could have abandoned the gun and saved his own life. He instead decided to keep firing at the tank in an attempt to render it useless before it caused any further damage. However, the tank's shell landed only inches away from Shabbir and exploded, throwing Shabbir and two other Pakistani soldiers 5 feet up in the air. Shabbir died seconds after he fell on the ground. His last words were: "Don't lose the bridge." Having seen Shabbir dead, the Pakistani soldiers fought with even more vigor, more out of revenge than for anything else. The Indian attack was beaten back, but at a grave cost. One of the bravest soldiers in the history of the Pakistan army had died. He was given the country's highest gallantry award, Nishan-e-Haider for his actions and eventual sacrifice for his country. This is perhaps the only case in Nishan-e-Haider history, where the gallantry award was given, not for a specific act, but for his inspiring performance throughout the war, until he died. After the War, one of the Indian commanders, Col. Shashi Pal, came to the headquarters in the Pakistan area for talks. He was given the currency that Shabbir had sent back from the bunkers, with due apologies for the currency that had been burnt for making tea. Shashi Pal shook his head slightly and said, "Politics apart, he was a fine soldier." Later it was also found out that the Indians did have the explosives in place to blow up Gurmakhera Bridge. But the remote detonation had not worked for one reason or the other.Further developmentsThere were a number of attacks on Saboona Ridge and Gurmakhera Bridge by the Indians between 6th December and 8th December which were repulsed. Pakistani soldiers also captured Gurmakhera village and successfully defended it against an Indian attack on 15th - 16th December 1971. The army high command for some unknown reason was totally numb. They could not take the decision to attack through the Army Reserves, and take advantage of a situation that Sharif and his men had created for them till the 5th of December. Even the brigade and corps commanders of the Solemanki sector suggested an attack to GHQ, but it took the high command three days just to review and reject it. They havebeen duly condemned for this hesitancy in the Hamood ur Rehman Report. The reversal during the Longewala, Shakargarh and Sialkot sectors also meant that most of the Army Reserve troops had to be sent to replenish those forces which had been on the losing side. Hence depleted, it was never in a position to attack. Another problem that the GHQ mentioned for their inaction was the lack of coordination between the Air Force and the Army, and also between 2 Corps and 4 Corps which were operating in this area (2 Corp was supposed to attack India). General Niazi's incorrect reports being sent from East Pakistan from 6th December onwards could also have made the GHQ think that perhaps it was pointless to attack India if Niazi could not hold on to East Pakistan. After all, the point of the Western Theatre attack was to diminish Indian forces in the East, and also to make them retreat out of that territory. General Niazi was later recommended for court martial in the Hamood ur Rehman report. The recommendation, however, has not been carried out as yet.